Institutional Repository

The (Non) acceptance of Belhar in the Dutch Reformed Church: Analysing Synodical Debates of 2011 and 2013

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Van Wyngaard, George Jacobus
dc.date.accessioned 2024-02-26T11:19:01Z
dc.date.available 2024-02-26T11:19:01Z
dc.date.issued 2019
dc.identifier.citation Van Wyngaard, GJ. 2019. The (non)acceptance of Belhar in the Dutch Reformed Church: Analysing synodical debates of 2011 and 2013 in Studia Historiae Ecclesiasticae, 45(3) en
dc.identifier.issn 2412-4265
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.25159/2412-4265/6230
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/10500/30891
dc.description.abstract This article analyses the open session debates on the Belhar Confession at the 2011 and 2013 General Synod meetings of the Dutch Reformed Church. It identifies six key themes that repeatedly emerge from arguments made by delegates, namely: 1) accepting Belhar for the sake of the youth and future of the church; 2) Belhar as guide in the mission of the church; 3) Belhar as challenge to racism within the church; 4) Belhar and its relationship to liberation theologies; 5) the role of members in formal adoption of a new confession; and 6) adoption of confessions in ways which would not make them binding on all. From these themes three matters, which remain outstanding in terms of how the Dutch Reformed Church engages with the Belhar Confession, are raised: 1) the relationship between mission and racism; 2) the history of heresy and its implication for the present; and 3) the implication of and response to black and liberation theologies. These matters are identified as challenges given particular meaning in light of the emphasis on local congregations and members of the Dutch Reformed Church when discussing the Belhar Confession. en
dc.language.iso en en
dc.publisher Unisa Press en
dc.subject Confession of Belhar en
dc.subject Dutch Reformed Church en
dc.subject General Synod en
dc.title The (Non) acceptance of Belhar in the Dutch Reformed Church: Analysing Synodical Debates of 2011 and 2013 en
dc.type Article en
dc.description.department Philosophy, Practical and Systematic Theology en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search UnisaIR


Browse

My Account

Statistics