dc.contributor.author |
Laflamme, Lucie
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Chipps, J
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Fangerau, H
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Juth, N
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Légaré, F
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Sawe, H.R
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Wallis, L
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2022-03-17T14:21:43Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2022-03-17T14:21:43Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2019 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
L. Laflamme, J. Chipps, H. Fangerau, N. Juth, F. Légaré, H. R. Sawe & L. Wallis (2019) Targeting ethical considerations tied to image-based mobile health diagnostic support specific to clinicians in low-resource settings: the Brocher proposition, Global Health Action, 12:1, 1666695, DOI: 10.1080/16549716.2019.1666695 |
en |
dc.identifier.uri |
https://hdl.handle.net/10500/28618 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Background: mHealth applications assist workflow, help move towards equitable access to care,
and facilitate care delivery. They have great potential to impact care in low-resource countries,
but have significant ethical concerns pertaining to patient autonomy, safety, and justice.
Objective: To achieve consensus among stakeholders on how to address concerns pertaining
to autonomy, safety, and justice among mHealth developers and users in low-resource
settings, in particular for the application of image-based consultation for diagnostic support.
Methods: A consensus approach was taken during a three-day workshop using a purposive
sample of global mHealth stakeholders (n = 27) professionally and geographically spread.
Throughout a series of introductory talks, group brainstorming, plenary reviews, and synth esis by the moderators, lists of actions were generated that address the concerns engendered
by mHealth applications on autonomy, justice and safety, taking into account the develop ment, implementation, and scale-up phases of an mHealth application lifecycle.
Results: Several types of actions were recommended; key ones among them included
building in risk mitigation measures from the development stage, establishing inclusive
consultation processes, using open sources platform whenever possible, training all clinical
users, and bearing in mind that the gold standard of care is face-to-face consultation with the
patient. Recommendations of patient, community and health system participation and of
governance were identified as cutting across the mHealth lifecycle.
Conclusion: Priorities agreed-upon at the meeting echo those put forward concerning other
domains and locations of application of mHealth. Those more forcefully articulated are the
need to adopt and maintain participatory processes as well as promoting self-governance.
They are expected to cut across the mHealth lifecycle and are prerequisites to the safeguard
of autonomy, safety and justice. |
en |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en |
dc.subject |
mHealth; ethics; diagnostic support; autonomy; patient safety; low resource settings |
en |
dc.title |
Targeting ethical considerations tied to image based mobile health diagnostic support specific to clinicians in low-resource settings: the Brocher proposition |
en |
dc.type |
Article |
en |
dc.description.department |
Institute for Social and Health Studies (ISHS) |
en |