dc.contributor.author |
Wilson, Patricia
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Mavhandu-Mudzusi, Azwihangwisi Helen
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2021-08-06T15:11:02Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2021-08-06T15:11:02Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2019-08-05 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Wilson P, Mavhandu- Mudzusi AH. (2019) Working in partnership with communities to improve health and research outcomes. Comparisons and commonalities between the UK and South Africa. Primary Health Care Research & Development 20(e129): 1–9. doi: 10.1017/S1463423619000677 |
en |
dc.identifier.uri |
. doi: 10.1017/S1463423619000677 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10500/27772 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Community and public participation and involvement is an underpinning principle of primary
health care, an essential component of a social justice-orientated approach to health care and a
vehicle to improving health outcomes for patients, public and communities. However, influenced
by history and context, there are intrinsic issues surrounding power imbalance and other
barriers to partnerships between communities, public, policy makers and researchers. It is
important to acknowledge these issues, and through doing so share experiences and learn from
those working within very different settings.
In South Africa, community participation is seen as a route to decolonisation. It is also integral
to the core functions of South African Higher Education Institutes, alongside teaching and
research. In the UK, there has also been a history of participation and involvement as part
of a social rights movement, but notably public involvement has become embedded in publicly
funded health research as a policy imperative.
In this paper, we draw on our respective programmes of work in public and community
participation and involvement. These include a South African community engagement project
to reduce teenage pregnancy and HIV infection working through a partnership between
teachers, students and university academics, and a national evaluation in England of public
involvement in applied health research. We begin by highlighting the lack of clarity and terms
used interchangeably to describe participation, engagement and involvement. Frameworks for
partnership working with relevance to South Africa and the UK are then analysed, suggesting
key themes of relationships, working together, and evaluation and monitoring. The South
African project and examples of public involvement in English primary and community care
research are examined through these themes. We conclude the paper by mapping out common
enablers and barriers to partnership working within these very different contexts. |
en |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en |
dc.publisher |
Cambridge University Press |
en |
dc.subject |
Research Subject Categories::INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH AREAS |
en |
dc.subject |
Research Subject Categories::SOCIAL SCIENCES |
en |
dc.subject |
Research Subject Categories::INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH AREAS |
en |
dc.subject |
Research Subject Categories::INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH AREAS |
en |
dc.title |
Working in partnership with communities to improve health and research outcomes. Comparisons and commonalities between the UK and South Africa |
en |
dc.type |
Article |
en |
dc.description.department |
Health Studies |
en |