dc.contributor.author |
Louw, V.N.
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2018-12-13T12:08:53Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2018-12-13T12:08:53Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2012 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Louw, VN. 2012. From Public Administration to governance: Science or ideology? Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 47 (1). p. 88-101 |
en |
dc.identifier.issn |
0036-0767 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10500/25150 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Governments have been launching major public sector reforms. Traditional
public services are under pressure to transform and seem to be evolving
– but into what? In the 1970s one could generally talk of public administration.
In the 1980s came the new move to the New Public Management (NPM),
and some to Public Administration and Management. Recently some authors
have argued that there is a further shift from the NPM to governance. Although
public sector reforms are influenced by global precedents, local dynamics necessitates
specific responses from politicians, academics and public officials. This
much is so in South Africa where evidence shows that theory played a secondary
role in the praxis of public administration. Instead, that praxis is dictated by political
agendas and what is taught at traditional universities and the universities of
technologies are uncritically supportive of these agendas. The aim of this article
is to provide a content analysis of the ongoing shift from the concept of public
administration to governance by looking at the theories and approaches that have
dominated the public administration arena from the traditional administration
approach to the current governance approach. The article also seeks to investigate
the reasons for this shift. |
en |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en |
dc.publisher |
SAAPAM |
en |
dc.subject |
Public Administration |
en |
dc.subject |
Governance |
en |
dc.title |
From Public Administration to governance: Science or ideology? |
en |
dc.type |
Article |
en |
dc.description.department |
Public Administration |
en |