Institutional Repository

The Defence of Contributory Intent: Voluntary Assumption of Risk

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Ahmed, Raheel
dc.date.accessioned 2018-10-08T13:50:46Z
dc.date.available 2018-10-08T13:50:46Z
dc.date.issued 2011
dc.identifier.citation Ahmed R "The Defence of Contributory Intent: Voluntary Assumption of Risk" 2011: 73 THRHR 697-704 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10500/24892
dc.description.abstract The plaintiffs, Neethling and Breytenbach, were travelling with the defendant, Oosthuizen (and his wife), in a Land Rover. They had gone on an extended holiday tour of Mozambique and were returning to George in South Africa. Their final stop was supposed to be the Gariep Dam in the Free State but unfortunately their holiday was cut short due to an accident which occurred on 3 April 2003. At the time of the accident, the defendant was driving a Land Rover which was towing a heavily laden trailer on a gravel road when the left rear tyre burst. The defendant lost control of the vehicle which overturned and landed on its wheels on the other side of the road. Breytenbach (second plaintiff), was asleep at the time of the accident and therefore could not recall how the accident occurred. As a result of him not wearing a seatbelt he was thrown out of the vehicle and landed unconscious on the road. He suffered a contusion of the brain and cuts to his face and head. Neethling (first plaintiff) suffered injuries to her right foot. en
dc.language.iso en en
dc.publisher LexisNexis South Africa en
dc.subject Contributory fault en
dc.subject Voluntary assumption of risk en
dc.subject Neethling v Oosthuizen 2009 5 SA 376 (WCC) en
dc.title The Defence of Contributory Intent: Voluntary Assumption of Risk en
dc.type Article en
dc.description.department Private Law en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search UnisaIR


Browse

My Account

Statistics