dc.contributor.author |
Ahmed, Raheel
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Steynberg, Loma
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2018-10-08T13:27:50Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2018-10-08T13:27:50Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2013 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Ahmed R and Steynberg L "'Quad motorcycle' qualified as a motor vehicle in terms of the RAF Act 56 of 1996 -requirements relaxed in Jeffrey v Road Accident Fund 2012 4 SA 475 (GSJ)" |
en |
dc.identifier.issn |
2225-7160 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10500/24878 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
A claimant can only be successful with a claim against the Road Accident Fund (RAF) if the claimant was in fact injured by the negligent driving of a "motor vehicle" or "other unlawful" act connected to a "motor vehicle or the driving thereof" (Klopper Third Party Compensation (2012) 64). Thus the definition of a "motor vehicle" is of paramount importance. If the injury or death of a person was caused by something other than the driving of a "motor vehicle" or "other unlawful act" then the claimant would not be able to claim from the RAF (Klopper 56). Section 1 of the Road Accident Fund Act 56 of 1996 (the Act) defines a "motor vehicle" as:
[a]ny vehicle designed or adapted for propulsion or haulage on a road by means of fuel, gas or electricity, including a trailer, a caravan, an agricultural or any other implement designed or adapted to be drawn by such motor vehicle. (our emphasis) |
en |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en |
dc.publisher |
Pretoria University Law Press |
en |
dc.subject |
Road Accident Fund |
en |
dc.subject |
Quad motorcycle |
en |
dc.subject |
Jeffrey v Road Accident Fund 2012 4 SA 475 (GSJ) |
en |
dc.subject |
motor vehicle accident |
en |
dc.title |
"Quad motorcycle" qualified as a motor vehicle in terms of the RAF Act 56 of 1996 -requirements relaxed in Jeffrey v Road Accident Fund 2012 4 SA 475 (GSJ)" 2013: 46(3) De Jure 245-266 |
en |
dc.type |
Article |
en |
dc.description.department |
Private Law |
en |