dc.contributor.author |
Amanda, Spies
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2018-07-17T07:18:22Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2018-07-17T07:18:22Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2016 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
A Spies 'Perpetuating Harm: The sentecning of rape offenders under South African law' 2016 (2) SALJ 389 |
en |
dc.identifier.issn |
0258-2503 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10500/24473 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Feminists have long viewed the criminal justice system — the system that women access to
gain protection from or recourse against sexual violence — as the ultimate gendered
institution, often reinforcing deeply sexist assumptions about women. The sentencing of
rape offenders under current minimum-sentencing legislation has done little to change this
perception, as judicial officers employ commonly held rape myths and stereotypes in their
sentencing practice. This article explores the sentencing of rape offenders under the
minimum-sentencing legislation and highlights the need for judicial sensitisation in
adjudicating sexual violence matters. |
en |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en |
dc.publisher |
Juta |
en |
dc.title |
Perpetuating Harm: The sentencing of rape offenders under South African Law |
en |
dc.type |
Article |
en |
dc.description.department |
Public, Constitutional and International Law |
en |