dc.contributor.author |
Van der Poel, K.G.
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Bryson, I.R.
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2018-05-30T11:55:14Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2018-05-30T11:55:14Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
1986 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Van der Poel, K.G.; Bryson, I.R. (1986) Protection of computerised private information: A comparative analysis. Quaestiones Informaticae Vol 4 No 3 1986 |
en |
dc.identifier.issn |
0254-2757 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10500/24163 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
The principles of protection of private information have gradually been defined during the last decades. The US
Privacy Act of 1974 regulates practices of the federal government. Two committees of the UK government have
prepared the Data Protection Act of 1984. Codes of practice play an important role in the Netherlands. In South
Africa, data privacy is protected by the law of delict. However this provides a weak and reactive opportunity for
redress. While the law commission is preparing to study the subject in depth, professional organizations should
establish codes of practice. |
en |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en |
dc.publisher |
Computer Society of South Africa (on behalf of SAICSIT) |
en |
dc.title |
Protection of computerised private information: A comparative analysis |
en |
dc.type |
Article |
en |
dc.description.department |
School of Computing |
en |