dc.contributor.author |
Amanda, Spies
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2018-02-08T09:33:39Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2018-02-08T09:33:39Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2016 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Amanda Spies 'Substantive equality, restorative justice and the sentencing of rape offenders ' (2016) 29 South African Journal of Criminal Justice 273-291. |
en |
dc.identifier.issn |
1011-8527 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10500/23599 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
This article explores the concept of substantive equality and how, as a constitutional value, it requires the consideration and application of restorative justice principles in the sentencing of rape offenders. With sexual violence being a difficult and controversial area in which to apply restorative justice principles, there is a need to understand the necessity for its application and analyse how it has been applied by South African courts. The argument is made that restorative justice should be seen as a method that gives effect to substantive equality values, allowing for a victim’s needs and context (including that of the offender) to be taken into account in handing down a just sentence. |
en |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en |
dc.publisher |
Juta |
en |
dc.title |
Substantive equality, restorative justice and the sentencing of rape offenders |
en |
dc.type |
Article |
en |
dc.description.department |
Public, Constitutional and International Law |
en |