dc.contributor.author |
Wiese, Mitzi
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2018-01-25T12:50:47Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2018-01-25T12:50:47Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2011 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Wiese, M “Liens: A closer look at some conceptual foundations” 2011 CILSA vol XLIV, no 1, 80 |
en |
dc.identifier.issn |
00104051 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10500/23558 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Liens are classified differently in diverse legal systems. The classification
of a lien points towards the specific operation thereof. In South African law
we distinguish between enrichment liens (real liens) which are regarded as
real rights and debtor-creditor liens which are regarded as personal rights.
The Dutch law, on the other hand, no longer distinguishes between
zakenrechtelijke retentierechten (real liens) and verbintenisrechtelijke
retentierechten (debtor-creditor liens). All liens are classified as
opschortingsrechten with real operation. Scots law distinguishes between
general and special liens and all liens are classified as real rights. A lien is
an important and powerful legal remedy and a form of security. Liens are
very important in modern day South Africa where access to courts are
expensive and time consuming. In this article I look at certain conceptual
foundations of liens in South African law, Dutch law and Scots law. |
en |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en |
dc.publisher |
CILSA |
en |
dc.subject |
liens |
en |
dc.subject |
retensieregte |
en |
dc.subject |
enrichment lien |
en |
dc.subject |
verrykingsretensiereg |
en |
dc.subject |
skuldeiser-skuldenaar retensiereg |
en |
dc.subject |
debtor and creditor lien |
en |
dc.subject |
right of retention |
en |
dc.title |
Liens: A closer look at some conceptual foundations |
en |
dc.type |
Article |
en |
dc.description.department |
Private Law |
en |