dc.contributor.author |
Onyancha, Omwoyo Bosire
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2017-03-07T07:00:51Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2017-03-07T07:00:51Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2017 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Onyancha, Omwoyo Bosire (2017) Altmetrics of South African Journals: Implications for Scholarly Impact of South African Research. Publishing Research. Quarterly;33:71–91. doi:10.1007/s12109-016-9485-0 |
en |
dc.identifier.issn |
1936-4792 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12109-016-9485-0 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10500/22104 |
|
dc.description |
Due to copyright restrictions the full-text of this article could not be attached to this record. Please follow the doi link at the top of the page to access the article on the publisher's website. |
en |
dc.description.abstract |
The purpose of the study was to investigate and compare the social media
(SM) impact of 273 South Africa Post-Secondary Education accredited journals,
which are recognised by the Department of Higher Education and Training of South
Africa for purposes of financial support. We used multiple sources to extract data
for the study, namely, Altmetric.com, Google Scholar (GS), Scopus (through
SCImago) and the Thomson Reuters (TR) Journal Citation Reports (JCR). Data was
analysed to determine South African journals’ presence in and impact on SM as well
as to contrast SM visibility and impact with the citation impact in GS, JCR and
Scopus. The Spearman correlation test was performed to compare the impact of the
journals on SM and other sources. The results reveal that 2923 articles published in
122 of the 273 South African (SA) journals have received at least one mention in
SM; the most commonly used SM platforms were Twitter and Facebook; the
journals indexed in the TR’s citation indexes and Scopus performed much better, in
terms of their average altmetrics, than non-TR and non-Scopus indexed journals;
and there were weak to moderate relationships among different types of altmetrics
and citation-based measures, thereby implying different kinds of journal impacts on
SM when compared to the scholarly impact reflected in citation databases. In
conclusion, South African journals’ impact on SM, just as is the case with countries
with similar economies, is minimal but has shown signs of growth. |
en |
dc.format.extent |
1 online resource (21 pages) |
|
dc.language.iso |
en |
en |
dc.subject |
Altmetrics |
en |
dc.subject |
Bibliometrics |
en |
dc.subject |
Compedia |
en |
dc.subject |
Google scholar |
en |
dc.subject |
Impact factor |
en |
dc.subject |
Scopus |
en |
dc.subject |
Journals |
en |
dc.subject |
South Africa |
en |
dc.subject.ddc |
020.727 |
|
dc.subject.lcsh |
Bibliometrics -- Methodology |
en |
dc.subject.lcsh |
Library science -- Research -- Methodology |
en |
dc.title |
Altmetrics of South African Journals: Implications for Scholarly Impact of South African Research |
en |
dc.type |
Article |
en |
dc.description.department |
Information Science |
en |