dc.contributor.author |
De Jong, Madelene
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2016-10-07T13:21:21Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2016-10-07T13:21:21Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2010 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
De Jong M & Kruger JM “The postponement and separation of children’s issues upon divorce – Quick relief or a glaring mistake? – K v K 2008 5 SA 431 (W)” 2010 (73) THRHR 153-157 |
en |
dc.identifier.issn |
1682-4490 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10500/21631 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
In this note the decision in K v K 2008 5 SA 431 (W), where a divorce order was granted before the court first ensured that the children's best interests are taken care of satisfactorily, is criticised. The piecemeal fashion in which the court was prepared to deal with the different aspects of parental responsibilities and rights is alarming. The court clearly disregarded the constitutional court's admonition that courts must always function in a manner which at all times shows due respect for children's rights. |
en |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en |
dc.publisher |
LexisNexis |
en |
dc.subject |
K v K 2008 5 SA 431 (W) |
en |
dc.subject |
children's rights; section 6(1) of the Divorce Act 70 of 1979 |
en |
dc.subject |
care of a child |
en |
dc.subject |
parental responsibilities and rights |
en |
dc.subject |
Mediation in Certain Divorce Matters Act 24 of 1987 |
en |
dc.subject |
section 28(2) of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 |
en |
dc.subject |
best interests of the child standard; divorce |
en |
dc.title |
The postponement and separation of children’s issues upon divorce – Quick relief or a glaring mistake? – K v K 2008 5 SA 431 (W) |
en |
dc.type |
Article |
en |
dc.description.department |
Private Law |
en |