dc.contributor.author |
De Jong, Madelene
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2016-07-13T06:43:15Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2016-07-13T06:43:15Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2015 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
De Jong M & Pintens W “Default matrimonial property regimes and the Principles of European Family Law – A European-South African comparison: Part 2” 2015:3 TSAR 551-566 |
en |
dc.identifier.issn |
0257-7747 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10500/20988 |
|
dc.language.iso |
en |
en |
dc.publisher |
Juta |
en |
dc.subject |
default matrimonial property system; universal community of property; section 19 of the Matrimonial Property Act 88 fo 1984; premarital contractual debts; separate assets; administration of the joint estate; division of joint estate; accrual system; assets excluded from accrual; accrual claims; protection of spouses inter partes; CEFL Principles; Zugewinngemeinshaft; cut-off date for determining accrual claims |
en |
dc.title |
Default matrimonial property regimes and the Principles of European Family Law – A European-South African comparison: Part 2 |
en |
dc.type |
Article |
en |
dc.description.department |
Private Law |
en |