University of Stellenbosch Legal Aid Clinic v Minister of Justice and Correctional Services (South African Human Rights Commission as amicus curiae) – Implications for the issuing of emoluments attachment order in maintenance matters?

De Jong, Madelene

dc.contributor.author	De Jong, Madelene
dc.date.accessioned	2016-07-08T12:21:45Z
dc.date.available	2016-07-08T12:21:45Z
dc.date.issued	2016
dc.identifier.citation	De Jong M “University of Stellenbosch Legal Aid Clinic v Minister of Justice and Correctional Services (South African Human Rights Commission as amicus curiae) – Implications for the issuing of emoluments attachment order in maintenance matters?” 2016 (79) 2 THRHR 261-276	en
dc.identifier.issn	1682-4490
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10500/20966
dc.language.iso	en	en
dc.publisher	LexisNexis	en
dc.subject	emoluments attachment order; section 65J of the Magistrates' Court Act 32 of 1944; section 45 of the Magistrates' Court Act 32 of 1944; maintenance payments, maintenance debtor; maintenance defaulter; constitutional rights of women and children; post-divorce maintenance; children's maintenance; poverty; right to equality; children's best interests; section 16(2) and (3) of the Maintenance Act 99 of 1998; section 26 of the Maintenance Act 99 of 1998; section 28 of the Maintenance Act 99 of 1998; section 29 of the Maintenance Act 99 of 1998; Maintenance Amendment Act 9 of 2015; maintenance enforcement methods; right to shelter; right to health; right to family life; limitation of rights; maintenance court; judgment debtor's wages; Constitutional court	en
dc.title	University of Stellenbosch Legal Aid Clinic v Minister of Justice and Correctional Services (South African Human Rights Commission as amicus curiae) – Implications for the issuing of emoluments attachment order in maintenance matters?	en
dc.type	Article	en