dc.contributor.author | van Wyk, Jo-Ansie | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-05-06T12:41:02Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-05-06T12:41:02Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.identifier.other | 10.1177/0975087815580727 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10500/18560 | |
dc.description.abstract | Almost three decades after South Africa dismantled its nuclear weapons programme and weapons, the question remains why the country has not reversed this decision. This contribution, using three illustrative case studies—the Treaty on the Non-proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), South Africa’s inspection team in Iraq (prior to the United States (US)-led invasion in March 2003 and the nuclear fuel reserve of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)—argues that South Africa has conducted its nuclear diplomacy using niche diplomacy as a diplomatic practice. These practices have revealed certain normative principles of South Africa’s post-apartheid nuclear diplomacy, which explain why the country has not reversed its decision. The contribution analyses South Africa’s nuclear diplomacy in the early twenty-first century by focusing on selected post-2000 nuclear-related events and developments. | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.rights | CC0 1.0 Universal | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ | * |
dc.subject | South Africa | en |
dc.subject | Nuclear | en |
dc.subject | Diplomacy | en |
dc.subject | Niche diplomacy | en |
dc.subject | Principles | en |
dc.subject | IAEA | en |
dc.subject | Iraq | en |
dc.subject | NPT | en |
dc.title | South Africa’s Postapartheid nuclear diplomacy: practice and principles | en |
dc.type | Article | en |
dc.description.department | Political Sciences | en |
The following license files are associated with this item: