dc.contributor.author |
Havenga, Michele
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2015-02-25T14:44:48Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2015-02-25T14:44:48Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2004 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Havenga, Michele (2004) Directors in Competition with Their Companies. South African Mercentile Law Journal 16 (2) |
en |
dc.identifier.issn |
10150099 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10500/18294 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
The duty of directors to act in good faith and in the best interests of the
company is beyond dispute. Where to draw the parameters of this
obligation is at times a little more difficult. Uncertainties in this area
include the scope of the obligation (if any) after the director's resignation,
the extent to which a director may compete with her company, and how
far a director may go in setting up a competing business in contemplation
of resignation from office. These issues were recently considered by the
Chancery Division in England in British Midland Tool Ltd v Midland
International Tooling Ltd and Others ([2003] 2 BCLC 523 (ChD)). |
en |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en |
dc.publisher |
Juta Law |
en |
dc.title |
Directors in Competition with Their Companies |
en |
dc.type |
Article |
en |
dc.description.department |
School of Interdisciplinary Research and Graduate Studies (SIRGS) |
en |