An enactivist approach to teaching and learning critical reasoning in ODL

Abstract

The current social constructivist approach to teaching critical reasoning in an open distance learning (ODL) environment may well be reductionist in the sense that it aims at training learners’ intellects to minimise errors and distortions of thought. Within the context of adult education and theories of learning, research indicates that social constructivism fails educational practices. These studies suggest that this is the result of focusing too narrowly on cognitive knowledge. Consequently, a social constructivist approach falls short of reflecting critically on the epistemological and ontological assumptions that underpin its pedagogical framework. However, I argue that, while the impact of sociocultural realities and political power structures on epistemological paradigms and educational practices cannot be ignored, social constructivism falls short of taking into account the embodied everyday experiences that form the vital context within which sense-making takes place. In the light of the above considerations, this article reflects critically on the current pedagogical style underlying the teaching of critical reasoning at Unisa. By investigating enactivism as an alternative approach, I propose a re-conceptualisation of the current critical reasoning teaching paradigm so as to reconsider the question of how we learn things and to understand the process whereby meanings are created, not only rationally but also across multidimensional contexts and complex situations in which learners operate and of which they form an integral part