dc.contributor.author |
Schoeman, Sonja
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2012-11-02T08:49:27Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2012-11-02T08:49:27Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2012-11-02 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10500/7645 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
consequences and how it can be addressed. A qualitative intrinsic case study of a sample of school History texts from three textbooks published post-2004 was conducted to determine the extent of the use of gender-inclusive/exclusive language in the texts. The micro-level critical discourse analysis of the linguistic elements and texture of the texts revealed that on the 258 pages analysed, 642 occurrences of gendered language were found. All three selected texts contained occurrences of gender-exclusive language. The generic he and man were less of a problem than gender stereotyping, firstness and omission. Although the raw numbers revealed that the overall instances of gender-exclusive language in the linguistic elements were few, gender-exclusive language persisted in the texture of the texts. The solution seems to be critical literacy. Teachers are encouraged to discuss with learners why gender-exclusive language may occur in these texts and what could be done to eliminate gendered language. The procedure of this single case study could be repeated in multiple case studies of the other school subjects. |
en |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en |
dc.subject |
Critical literacy |
en |
dc.subject |
Gender inclusive language |
en |
dc.subject |
Gender exclusive language |
en |
dc.subject |
School texts |
en |
dc.title |
Femonics : gender and language in South Africa school history texts |
en |
dc.type |
Inaugural Lecture |
en |
dc.description.department |
Curriculum and Instructional Studies |
|