Institutional Repository

Community, intervention and provider support influences on implementation: reflections from a South African illustration of safety, peace and health promotion

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author van Niekerk, Ashley
dc.contributor.author Seedat, Mohamed
dc.contributor.author Kramer, Sherianne
dc.contributor.author Suffla, Shahnaaz
dc.contributor.author Bulbulia, Abdulsamed
dc.contributor.author Ismail, Ghouwa
dc.date.accessioned 2017-02-10T17:53:31Z
dc.date.available 2017-02-10T17:53:31Z
dc.date.issued 2014-06-20
dc.identifier.citation BMC Public Health. 2014 Jun 20;14(Suppl 2):S7
dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-S2-S7
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10500/21995
dc.description.abstract Abstract Background The development, implementation and evaluation of community interventions are important for reducing child violence and injuries in low- to middle-income contexts, with successful implementation critical to effective intervention outcomes. The assessment of implementation processes is required to identify the factors that influence effective implementation. This article draws on a child safety, peace and health initiative to examine key factors that enabled or hindered its implementation, in a context characterised by limited resources. Methods A case study approach was employed. The research team was made up of six researchers and intervention coordinators, who led the development and implementation of the Ukuphepha Child Study in South Africa, and who are also the authors of this article. The study used author observations, reflections and discussions of the factors perceived to influence the implementation of the intervention. The authors engaged in an in-depth and iterative dialogic process aimed at abstracting the experiences of the intervention, with a recursive cycle of reflection and dialogue. Data were analysed utilising inductive content analysis, and categorised using classification frameworks for understanding implementation. Results The study highlights key factors that enabled or hindered implementation. These included the community context and concomitant community engagement processes; intervention compatibility and adaptability issues; community service provider perceptions of intervention relevance and expectations; and the intervention support system, characterised by training and mentorship support. Conclusions This evaluation illustrated the complexity of intervention implementation. The study approach sought to support intervention fidelity by fostering and maintaining community endorsement and support, a prerequisite for the unfolding implementation of the intervention.
dc.title Community, intervention and provider support influences on implementation: reflections from a South African illustration of safety, peace and health promotion
dc.type Journal Article
dc.date.updated 2017-02-10T17:53:31Z
dc.language.rfc3066 en
dc.rights.holder van Niekerk et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search UnisaIR


Browse

My Account

Statistics