Institutional Repository

The fourth gospel as reaction to militant Jewish expectation of kingship, reflected in certain dead sea scrolls

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Vorster, J. N. (Johannes Nicolaas) en
dc.contributor.author Trost, Travis Darren en
dc.date.accessioned 2009-08-25T10:58:43Z
dc.date.available 2009-08-25T10:58:43Z
dc.date.issued 2005
dc.date.submitted 2005 en
dc.identifier.citation Trost, Travis Darren (2005) The fourth gospel as reaction to militant Jewish expectation of kingship, reflected in certain dead sea scrolls, University of South Africa, Pretoria, <http://hdl.handle.net/10500/1985> en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10500/1985
dc.description.abstract The discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls has provided an opportunity to reexamine the formation of the Gospel of John. This study will utilize Dead Sea finds coupled with other Second Temple literature to examine how the Gospel of John portrays Jesus as being a king. The approach of this study to use a narrative approach that builds on the Gospel of John as a finished text. The contribution of a source critical approach is not disparaged but the narrative approach will allow the Johannine community to be seen in the context of the immediate post-Second Temple era. The limited literacy of the probable first audience of this text suggests that a narrative approach will best be able to understand the background to the formation of the Gospel of John. A central contention of this study is that the Gospel of John was composed after the Jewish Revolt and after the Synoptics. Thus it deserves the appellation of the Fourth Gospel and is called such in this study. The Fourth Gospel was composed at a time when Roman interest in anything connected to Judaism was sure to attract special interest. Thus the portrayal of Jesus as the Davidic Messiah needed to be handled carefully. The imagery of the new David found in 4Q504 compared with the imagery of Jesus being the Good Shepherd becomes an important part of the argument of this study on whether this Gospel portrays Jesus as being the Davidic Messiah. Jesus as the Good Shepherd showed Jews that Jesus is the Davidic Messiah without overtly offending Roman sensibilities. Furthermore evidence from Christian and Jewish sources indicates that an interest in a Third Temple was still stirring between the Jewish and Bar-Kochba Revolts. The Fourth Gospel shows Jesus as the Davidic Messiah who replaces the Temple because the Good Shepherd was the perfect sacrifice. en
dc.format.extent 1 online resource (ix, 261 leaves)
dc.language.iso en en
dc.subject Josephus en
dc.subject Flavian dynasty en
dc.subject Shepherd en
dc.subject Messiah en
dc.subject Second Temple Judaism en
dc.subject Qumran community en
dc.subject Johannine community en
dc.subject Fourth gospel en
dc.subject Term (bandit) en
dc.subject New David en
dc.subject.ddc 226.5066
dc.subject.lcsh Bible. N.T. John -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.
dc.subject.lcsh Bible. N.T. John -- Criticism, Textual
dc.subject.lcsh Dead Sea scrolls
dc.subject.lcsh Qumran community
dc.subject.lcsh God -- Kingship -- Biblical teaching
dc.title The fourth gospel as reaction to militant Jewish expectation of kingship, reflected in certain dead sea scrolls en
dc.type Thesis en
dc.description.department New Testament en
dc.description.degree D. Th. (New Testament) en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search UnisaIR


Browse

My Account

Statistics