Institutional Repository

Between conceptualism and constitutionalism : private-law and constitutional perspectives on property

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Maanen, Gerrit van
dc.contributor.author Kroeze, Irma Johanna
dc.date.accessioned 2015-01-23T04:24:54Z
dc.date.available 2015-01-23T04:24:54Z
dc.date.issued 1997-11
dc.identifier.citation Kroeze, Irma Johanna (1997) Between conceptualism and constitutionalism : private-law and constitutional perspectives on property, University of South Africa, Pretoria, <http://hdl.handle.net/10500/17132> en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10500/17132
dc.description.abstract The conceptualist view of property is based on the conceptual system or hierarchy of rights conceived by Grotius and developed by the pandectists. It rests on the assumptions that ownership is neutral and timeless. As such it has a number of abstract, timeless and universal characteristics, namely absoluteness, uniformity and exclusivity. Combined with liberalism, this concept of property becomes the guarantee of liberty and equality. The first part of this study shows that not only are the assumptions historically unfounded, but this conceptualist view of property made liberty and equality for women, in particular, impossible. The liberal, conceptualist property concept is a modernist construct that cannot guarantee either liberty or equality. The question then becomes whether constitutionalism can do what conceptualism cannot- can die constitutional protection of property guarantee liberty and equality. The second part of this study suggests that the answer to this is an "it depends" kind of answer. It depends on the structure of a constitution, underlying philosophical, political and, above all, hermeneutics theories employed by courts. In the South African context courts need to reject the private-law conceptualist view of ownership in favour of a constitutional property concept. This last-mentioned concept should be based on the values and normative context of the 1996 constitution. As such it involves value choices and making a political stand. Courts need to abandon conceptualist frameworks and decide on the proportionality of limitations on property. The conclusion to this study suggests that a feminist understanding of human beings as socially constructed and constrained, so that democracy alone cannot provide an answer to the counter-majaritarian dilemma, is necessary far an understanding of property. The creative tension provided by the feminist conflict between a political agenda and a respect far contexts may provide a framework far adjudicating an property issues. en
dc.format.extent 1 online resource (v, 325 pages)
dc.language.iso en
dc.subject Property en
dc.subject Conceptualism en
dc.subject Constitutionalism en
dc.subject Feminism en
dc.subject Grotius en
dc.subject Kant en
dc.subject Contextualism en
dc.subject Constitutional hermeneutics en
dc.subject Post-modernist en
dc.subject Ownership en
dc.subject.ddc 346.43068
dc.subject.lcsh Right of property -- South Africa en
dc.subject.lcsh Property -- South Africa en
dc.subject.lcsh Constitutional law -- South Africa en
dc.title Between conceptualism and constitutionalism : private-law and constitutional perspectives on property en
dc.type Thesis
dc.description.department Private Law
dc.description.degree LL.D.


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search UnisaIR


Browse

My Account

Statistics