Institutional Repository

Statutory civil remedies in trade mark litigation

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Visser, C. J.
dc.contributor.advisor Rutherford, B. R.
dc.contributor.author Kelbrick, R. (Roshana) en
dc.date.accessioned 2015-01-23T04:24:52Z
dc.date.available 2015-01-23T04:24:52Z
dc.date.issued 1997-06 en
dc.identifier.citation Kelbrick, R. (Roshana) (1997) Statutory civil remedies in trade mark litigation, University of South Africa, Pretoria, <http://hdl.handle.net/10500/17062> en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10500/17062
dc.description.abstract Little attention is paid to the civil remedies available when infringement of a trade mark or the right to goodwill occurs. Yet, for the owners of ~uch rights, these remedies are of much greater importance than theoretical considerations regarding the nature of the rights or what constitutes their infringement. This thesis analyses the civil remedies for trade mark infringement granted by the South African Trade Marks Act 194 of 1993. In the South African context, any consideration of civil remedies is rendered problematic by the attempted graft of English remedies onto a legal system with a different common-law background. It is, therefore, essential first to trace the English origin and application of these remedies, and then to determine whether each remedy is acceptable in terms of the South African common law. This is necessary, as our courts have previously rejected or adapted English remedies which were unknown to our common law but which Parliament introduced in legislation. The remedies of interdict (or injunction) in final and interlocutory form, compensatory damages, reasonable royalties, and delivery up are analysed from a substantive law and a procedural perspective. The procedural innovation of an inquiry as to damages is also considered. In respect of each remedy, (1) the English roots and development of the remedy are traced; (2) differences of approach in two other Commonwealth jurisdictions, Australia and Canada, are highlighted; (3) the development of the South African equivalent is detailed; and (4) suggestions for the future implementation of the remedy in South Africa are made. In the penultimate chapter, our common law and legislation (including the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa 108 of 1996 ) are measured against the requirements of the Agreement on Trade-related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS). Recommendations for the effective utilization of each remedy in South Africa are then made. They include suggestions for legislative amendment in respect of delivery up and an inquiry as to damages, and the introduction of statutory damages as an further civil remedy.
dc.format.extent 1 online resource (xvi, 378 p.) en
dc.language.iso en
dc.subject Intellectual property
dc.subject Civil remedy
dc.subject Trade marks
dc.subject Passing off
dc.subject Interdict
dc.subject Injunction
dc.subject Damages
dc.subject Statutory damages
dc.subject Royalty
dc.subject Delivery up
dc.subject Inquiry
dc.subject.ddc 346.488068 en
dc.subject.lcsh Remedies (Law) -- South Africa en
dc.subject.lcsh Trademarks -- Law and legislation -- South Africa en
dc.title Statutory civil remedies in trade mark litigation en
dc.type Thesis
dc.description.department Mercentile Law
dc.description.degree LL. D. (Laws) en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search UnisaIR


Browse

My Account

Statistics