Institutional Repository

A comparative analysis of the equalisation of pension benefits under South African and German law

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Thomashausen, André
dc.contributor.author Spitz, Volker Gerhard Anton
dc.date.accessioned 2015-01-23T04:24:17Z
dc.date.available 2015-01-23T04:24:17Z
dc.date.issued 1992-06
dc.identifier.citation Spitz, Volker Gerhard Anton (1992) A comparative analysis of the equalisation of pension benefits under South African and German law, University of South Africa, Pretoria, <http://hdl.handle.net/10500/16098> en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10500/16098
dc.description.abstract The recognition in law of pension benefits and expectancies, as a matrimonial asset which may be subject to certain claims (and counterclaims), occured in South Africa in 1989. The starting point of this development was an investigation in 1984, on: "the possibility of making provisions for a divorced woman to share in the pension benefits of her former husband ". This investigation came about, in South Africa, after the matter had already been accepted, in many foreign legals systems, as a well-established, and most important concept of family law. The obvious question for the South African legislature was which of the pension-sharing schemes throughout the world would best serve as a model. Since the South African accrual system was largely based on the German Zugewinngemeinschaft, it seemed only natural that a close comparative study should be made of Germany's Versorgungsausgleich scheme. It is one of the aims of this thesis to point out whether and to what extent South Africa followed the German example. To do so, it will be necessary to examine first the different legal situations which were prevalent before and after the legal changes in the two countries and to elaborate on the reasons which led to these changes. The discussion in chapter three of how the German system of equalisation of pension expectancies, the so-called Versorgungsausgleich, is applied, will facilitate a comprehensive comparison with the South African scheme. The questions to be answered in the fifth chapter are whether it is appropriate to examine the equalisation of pension expectancies under South African law, which was only recently introduced, in a comparison with the German system and whether it is possible to speak of a Versorgungsausgleich when referring to the South African situation. Whenever possible, I have attempted to suggest solutions that may appear acceptable. To conclude the thesis, certain pension sharing problems arising under South African private international law will be briefly commented upon. en
dc.language.iso en en
dc.subject.ddc 346.166
dc.subject.lcsh Pensions -- Law and legislation -- South Africa en
dc.subject.lcsh Marital property -- Law and legislation -- Germany en
dc.subject.lcsh Divorce settlements -- Law and legislation -- Germany en
dc.subject.lcsh Pensions -- Law and legislation -- Germany en
dc.subject.lcsh Equitable distribution of marital property -- Law and legislation -- Germany en
dc.subject.lcsh Marital property -- Law and legislation -- South Africa en
dc.subject.lcsh Divorce settlements -- Law and legislation -- South Africa en
dc.subject.lcsh Equitable distribution of marital property -- Law and legislation -- South Africa en
dc.title A comparative analysis of the equalisation of pension benefits under South African and German law en
dc.type Dissertation
dc.description.department Private Law
dc.description.degree LLM


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search UnisaIR


Browse

My Account

Statistics