Institutional Repository

Debating the efficacy transitional justice mechanisms : the case of national healing in Zimbabwe, 1980-2011

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Labuschagne, P. (Pieter)
dc.contributor.author Benyera, Everisto
dc.date.accessioned 2015-01-20T10:20:36Z
dc.date.available 2015-01-20T10:20:36Z
dc.date.issued 2015-01-20
dc.date.issued 2014-04
dc.identifier.citation Benyera, Everisto (2014) Debating the efficacy transitional justice mechanisms : the case of national healing in Zimbabwe, University of South Africa, Pretoria, <http://hdl.handle.net/10500/15410> en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10500/15410
dc.description.abstract This study is an exploration of transitional justice mechanisms available to post conflict communities. It is a context sensitive and sustained interrogation of the effectiveness of endogenous transitional justice mechanisms in post-colonial Zimbabwe. The study utilised Ruti Teitel’s (1997: 2009-2080) realist/idealist theory as its theoretical framework. Using the case of Africa in general and Zimbabwe in particular, it analyses the application of imported idealist transitional justice mechanisms, mainly International Criminal Court (ICC) trials. It also debates the efficacy of realist transitional justice mechanisms, mainly the South African model of a Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC).The study explores the application of what it terms broad realist transitional justice mechanisms used mostly in rural areas of Zimbabwe to achieve peace building and reconciliation. These modes of everyday healing and reconciliation include the traditional institutions of ngozi (avenging spirit), botso (self-shaming), chenura (cleansing ceremonies), nhimbe (community working groups) and nyaradzo (memorials). The key finding of this exploration is that local realist transitional justice mechanisms are more efficacious in fostering peace building and reconciliation than imported idealist mechanisms such as the ICC trials and imported realist mechanisms such as the TRC. More value can be realised when imported realist mechanisms and local realist transitional justice mechanisms complement each other. The study contributes to the literature on transitional justice in general and bottom-up, victim-centred reconciliation in particular. It offers a different approach to the study of transitional justice in post conflict Zimbabwe by recasting the debate away from the liberal peace paradigm which critiques state centric top-down approaches such as trials, clemencies, amnesties and institutional reform. The study considers the agency of ‘ordinary’ people in resolving the after effects of politically motivated harm. It also lays the foundation for further research into other traditional transitional justice mechanisms used for peace building and reconciliation elsewhere in Africa en
dc.format.extent 1 electronic resource (xv, 304 leaves) :illustrations en
dc.language.iso en en
dc.subject Transitional Justice en
dc.subject Traditional transitional justice mechanisms en
dc.subject Ngozi en
dc.subject Zimbabwe en
dc.subject Reconciliation en
dc.subject Human rights violations en
dc.subject Reparation en
dc.subject.ddc 342.8506891 en
dc.subject.lcsh Transitional justice -- Zimbabwe -- Case studies en
dc.subject.lcsh Reconciliation -- Political aspects -- Zimbabwe -- Case studies. en
dc.subject.lcsh International criminal courts -- Zimbabwe -- Case studies en
dc.subject.lcsh Political crimes and offenses -- Zimbabwe -- Case studies en
dc.title Debating the efficacy transitional justice mechanisms : the case of national healing in Zimbabwe, 1980-2011 en
dc.type Thesis en
dc.description.department Political Sciences en
dc.description.degree D. Litt. et Phil. (African Politics) en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search UnisaIR


Browse

My Account

Statistics