Institutional Repository

A review of a decade’s scholarly publications (2004–2013) in the South African Journal of Industrial Psychology

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Coetzee, Melinde
dc.contributor.author Van Zyl, Llewellyn E.
dc.date.accessioned 2014-12-11T06:28:05Z
dc.date.available 2014-12-11T06:28:05Z
dc.date.issued 2014
dc.identifier.citation Coetzee, M. & Van Zyl, L.E. (2014). A review of a decade’s scholarly publications (2004 – 2013) in the South African Journal of Industrial Psychology. South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 40(1), Art. #1227, 16 pages. http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v40i1.1227 en
dc.identifier.issn 2071-0768
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10500/14580
dc.description.abstract Orientation: Publishing methodologically sound, empirically based studies in reputable accredited scientific journals are essential in order to advance knowledge and evidence-based practice in the field of industrial and organisational psychology. Research purpose: The purpose of the research was to conduct a broad content analysis of the articles published in the South African Journal of Industrial Psychology (SAJIP) between 2004 and 2013. The study aimed to provide a descriptive overview of the most frequent content themes, published authors and institutions, research approaches, strategies, designs and analysis techniques, software packages and sample sizes in industrial and organisational (I-O) psychology utilised in the publications. Motivation for study: The periodic analyses of published content in scholarly journals provide an index of the extent to which the publications reflect the scope of practice in a given discipline and broaden insight into the direction and relevance of research published in a journal. Research design, approach and method: A broad systematic content analysis was conducted of 342 documented articles published in the SAJIP between 2004 and 2013. Descriptive data (frequencies and percentages) were used to report the findings. Main findings: The publishing pattern of the SAJIP appeared to correspond with its focus and scope. Manuscripts utilising mostly cross-sectional quantitative correlational research designs with large samples (n > 201) were published in the SAJIP. The University of Johannesburg and Professor Sebastiaan (Ian) Rothmann were the largest contributors to publications between 2004 and 2013. Organisational psychology and psychometrics were the most prominent domains in I-O psychology research. Data were predominantly processed utilising SPSS. Practical implications: The insights derived from the findings can be employed to plan future research initiatives in the field of I-O psychology. Contribution/value-add: The findings provide valuable insight into the current status of the foci of I-O psychology research as published in the SAJIP between 2004 and 2013 and the contribution made by the SAJIP to advancing knowledge and evidence-based practice in I-O psychology. en
dc.language.iso en en
dc.publisher OASIS OpenJournals en
dc.subject Scholarly Publications en
dc.subject South African Journal of Industrial Psychology en
dc.title A review of a decade’s scholarly publications (2004–2013) in the South African Journal of Industrial Psychology en
dc.type Article en
dc.description.department Industrial and Organisational Psychology en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search UnisaIR


Browse

My Account

Statistics