<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
<channel rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/10500/5100">
<title>Books and chapters from books (English Studies)</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/10500/5100</link>
<description/>
<items>
<rdf:Seq>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/10500/5257"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/10500/5256"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/10500/5255"/>
</rdf:Seq>
</items>
<dc:date>2013-05-22T07:23:03Z</dc:date>
</channel>
<item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/10500/5257">
<title>The Impact of 1950s Banning of Some South African Writers on Teaching African Literature Today</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/10500/5257</link>
<description>The Impact of 1950s Banning of Some South African Writers on Teaching African Literature Today
Rafapa, Lesibana
This article argues that credit given to South African writers who were exiled during the fifties when banning by the apartheid government was rife, is sometimes premised on inadequate awareness of the contributions of writers like Es'kia Mphahlele.  Mphahlele's uniqueness as one of the black South African authors sometimes called Drum or Sophiatown writers is emphasized as a way of demonstrating what little analytical rigour was applied to writers of this period as a result of the banning of their books in apartheid South Africa.  A more serious critique of South African literature produced during this period is exemplified by the way I discuss Mphahlele's and some of his contemporaries' literature within the context of the 1950s.  A discussion of Ngugi's literary contribution by two critics is used as a case in point to highlight the aftermath of academia's virtual acquiescence to such chaining of creative freedom. The discussion thus holds the academic fraternity partly responsible in further obliterating traces of black South African writing of the fifties, and suggests that this should be reversed as exemplified by my own discussion of the Drum writers.  It is suggested that writings of the fifites should be excavated, studied and analysed afresh in academic circles utilising the approach I propose in this article, alongside other methods that may be deemed equally fruitful.  This paper argues that the impact of the harm caused by political incidents of the 1950s and the lethargy that gripped literary and educational circles in subsequent decades is still felt today in the classroom, necessitating conscious efforts to redress this gap in the teaching of black South African literature.
The article sprung from my doctoral research with the English department of the University of Stellenbosch in South Africa.
</description>
<dc:date>2007-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/10500/5256">
<title>South African Drum Writers of Fiction: The English Language and African Identity</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/10500/5256</link>
<description>South African Drum Writers of Fiction: The English Language and African Identity
Rafapa, Lesibana
The peer reviewed book chapter discusses how, in idiosyncratic ways, the various South African writers of the 1950s domesticate their medium of writing through the infusion of Africanist outlook into their fiction.
The paper emanated from a conference paper which I presented at the University of Botswana, with conference attendance funded by the University of Venda
</description>
<dc:date>2008-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/10500/5255">
<title>Subtitling, literacy and education in South Africa: putting</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/10500/5255</link>
<description>Subtitling, literacy and education in South Africa: putting
Rafapa, Lesibana; Kruger, Jan-Louis
According to the National Research Foundation in South Africa, “the&#13;
successful acquisition of language and literacy in a multilingual, multicultural&#13;
and increasingly globalised and technologically driven environment is&#13;
becoming more critical to educational and workplace success in South Africa"&#13;
(NRF, 2001). The current crisis in education in the country could well be&#13;
ascribed to the fact that South Africa has a literacy rate of less than 50%.&#13;
According to Project Literacy, 16% of the population are totally illiterate&#13;
(unable even to read their own names), and a further 40% are functionally&#13;
illiterate.
University of North West provided us with research resources while the Pan South African Language Board (PanSALB) sponsored conference attendance costs for presentation in Berlin, Germany.
</description>
<dc:date>2012-01-25T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>
