<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
<channel rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/10500/4081">
<title>Department of Finance, Risk management &amp; Banking</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/10500/4081</link>
<description/>
<items>
<rdf:Seq>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/10500/4203"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/10500/4191"/>
</rdf:Seq>
</items>
<dc:date>2013-05-20T08:46:25Z</dc:date>
</channel>
<item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/10500/4203">
<title>Banking lending business cycles : South African evidence</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/10500/4203</link>
<description>Banking lending business cycles : South African evidence
Akinboade, Oludele Akinloye; Makina, Daniel
The paper provides empirical analysis on the linkage between&#13;
the behavior of bank lending and business cycles in South Africa. Consistent&#13;
with theory, overall evidence suggesting pro-cyclicality of bank lending is&#13;
uncovered both at macro and micro levels. At macro level, bank lending and&#13;
lending rates have moved in tandem with business cycles. Real borrowing by&#13;
government was counter-cyclical to business cycles as would be expected&#13;
if the role of government was to fine-tune the economy during booms&#13;
and recessions. At micro level, bank lending to households and firms was&#13;
generally pro-cyclical. Even the growth of provisioning by banks has been&#13;
largely pro-cyclical to business cycles, though exceptions were recorded.&#13;
First, newmortgage lending exhibited counter-cyclical behavior before 1993.&#13;
We attributed this behavior to the political and economic climate prevailing&#13;
then which created uncertainties that made ownership of property a good&#13;
hedge against economic and political risks. Secondly, the growth of real&#13;
credit for investment and of foreign trade finance does not appear to have&#13;
been related to business cycles.
</description>
<dc:date>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/10500/4191">
<title>Bank lending and business cycles : South African evidence</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/10500/4191</link>
<description>Bank lending and business cycles : South African evidence
Oludele Akinloye, Akinboade; Daniel, Makina
The paper provides empirical analysis on the linkage between&#13;
the behavior of bank lending and business cycles in South Africa. Consistent&#13;
with theory, overall evidence suggesting pro-cyclicality of bank lending is&#13;
uncovered both at macro and micro levels. At macro level, bank lending and&#13;
lending rates have moved in tandem with business cycles. Real borrowing by&#13;
government was counter-cyclical to business cycles as would be expected&#13;
if the role of government was to fine-tune the economy during booms&#13;
and recessions. At micro level, bank lending to households and firms was&#13;
generally pro-cyclical. Even the growth of provisioning by banks has been&#13;
largely pro-cyclical to business cycles, though exceptions were recorded.&#13;
First, newmortgage lending exhibited counter-cyclical behavior before 1993.&#13;
We attributed this behavior to the political and economic climate prevailing&#13;
then which created uncertainties that made ownership of property a good&#13;
hedge against economic and political risks. Secondly, the growth of real&#13;
credit for investment and of foreign trade finance does not appear to have&#13;
been related to business cycles.
Research article
</description>
<dc:date>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>
