<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<title>Research Articles (Finance, Risk Management &amp; Banking)</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10500/4082" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/10500/4082</id>
<updated>2013-05-14T08:19:27Z</updated>
<dc:date>2013-05-14T08:19:27Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>Banking lending business cycles : South African evidence</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10500/4203" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Akinboade, Oludele Akinloye</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Makina, Daniel</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/10500/4203</id>
<updated>2012-08-03T08:47:02Z</updated>
<published>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Banking lending business cycles : South African evidence
Akinboade, Oludele Akinloye; Makina, Daniel
The paper provides empirical analysis on the linkage between&#13;
the behavior of bank lending and business cycles in South Africa. Consistent&#13;
with theory, overall evidence suggesting pro-cyclicality of bank lending is&#13;
uncovered both at macro and micro levels. At macro level, bank lending and&#13;
lending rates have moved in tandem with business cycles. Real borrowing by&#13;
government was counter-cyclical to business cycles as would be expected&#13;
if the role of government was to fine-tune the economy during booms&#13;
and recessions. At micro level, bank lending to households and firms was&#13;
generally pro-cyclical. Even the growth of provisioning by banks has been&#13;
largely pro-cyclical to business cycles, though exceptions were recorded.&#13;
First, newmortgage lending exhibited counter-cyclical behavior before 1993.&#13;
We attributed this behavior to the political and economic climate prevailing&#13;
then which created uncertainties that made ownership of property a good&#13;
hedge against economic and political risks. Secondly, the growth of real&#13;
credit for investment and of foreign trade finance does not appear to have&#13;
been related to business cycles.
</summary>
<dc:date>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Bank lending and business cycles : South African evidence</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10500/4191" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Oludele Akinloye, Akinboade</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Daniel, Makina</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/10500/4191</id>
<updated>2012-08-03T09:06:51Z</updated>
<published>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Bank lending and business cycles : South African evidence
Oludele Akinloye, Akinboade; Daniel, Makina
The paper provides empirical analysis on the linkage between&#13;
the behavior of bank lending and business cycles in South Africa. Consistent&#13;
with theory, overall evidence suggesting pro-cyclicality of bank lending is&#13;
uncovered both at macro and micro levels. At macro level, bank lending and&#13;
lending rates have moved in tandem with business cycles. Real borrowing by&#13;
government was counter-cyclical to business cycles as would be expected&#13;
if the role of government was to fine-tune the economy during booms&#13;
and recessions. At micro level, bank lending to households and firms was&#13;
generally pro-cyclical. Even the growth of provisioning by banks has been&#13;
largely pro-cyclical to business cycles, though exceptions were recorded.&#13;
First, newmortgage lending exhibited counter-cyclical behavior before 1993.&#13;
We attributed this behavior to the political and economic climate prevailing&#13;
then which created uncertainties that made ownership of property a good&#13;
hedge against economic and political risks. Secondly, the growth of real&#13;
credit for investment and of foreign trade finance does not appear to have&#13;
been related to business cycles.
Research article
</summary>
<dc:date>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
